Hello friends,

Around the world, governments are quietly rewriting their definition of economic security. Supply chains once treated as background infrastructure are now strategic assets, and the question of who controls a country's critical inputs has moved to the center of policy. Mongolia is exposed to this shift in ways that rarely surface in public debate. Read on for the risks no one is naming along with the potential solutions Think Mongol is proposing.

Enjoying the insights? Please spread the joy — share CMM Capital with your network!

When discussions turn to Mongolia's economic security, fuel and food tend to dominate the public conversation. Yet some of the country's most consequential vulnerabilities receive far less attention.

As geopolitical tensions rise and governments around the world place greater emphasis on economic resilience, Mongolia faces a dual strategic vulnerability: the country is not only dependent on a single market for its exports, but is also placing a high-stakes bet on a single supplier for critical economic inputs. Should Russian supplies be disrupted or China's borders close, Mongolia would face immediate and significant disruptions that would reverberate throughout the economy.

Some supply chain risks indeed lie largely beyond Mongolia's control, including global commodity cycles, domestic conditions in neighboring countries, and geopolitical tensions. Others, however, are controllable, determined by domestic choices in production, regulation, and infrastructure planning.

It is in this second category that three deeper vulnerabilities stand out:

The first is grid constraints. Mongolia’s underdeveloped grid, with its limited geographic coverage, is increasingly becoming a binding constraint on economic growth, particularly as investment and extraction activities expand into more remote regions.

The second is fertilizer. Mongolia relies heavily on imports for the fertilizers needed to support domestic agriculture, with much of that supply originating from a single source. Any disruption, export restriction, or price shock could have implications not only for farmers, but also for food security more broadly.

The third is mining explosives. Mining remains the backbone of Mongolia's economy, yet the sector relies heavily on imported raw materials essential for explosive production, creating a vulnerability that receives little public attention.

At a time when governments are reassessing their dependencies and strengthening their strategic autonomy, Mongolia’s imperative is clear: develop greater domestic capacity and reduce avoidable external exposure where feasible. With its abundant natural resources, the country has room, in principle, to reduce several of these vulnerabilities.

The first step then is understanding where Mongolia remains vulnerable and where alternatives exist. The second is building credible roadmaps to reduce those dependencies. From there, the challenge becomes one of execution, which will take sustained political, legal, and policy commitment.

To explore these risks in greater detail and examine potential pathways for reducing them, read Think Mongol Institute’s full policy brief below.

Think Mongol Institute is an independent, nonprofit, and nonpartisan think tank based in Ulaanbaatar, dedicated to shaping Mongolia's path forward through rigorous research, open dialogue, and global engagement. Think Mongol’s work spans three core areas: Mongolia's resource economy, global and political affairs, and the country's long-term risks and opportunities.